Econometrica: Jan 1976, Volume 44, Issue 1

Threats, Counter-Threats, and Strategic Voting<91:TCASV>2.0.CO;2-X
p. 91-103

Prasanta K. Pattanaik

This paper seeks to prove that under a large class of group decision rules some sincere voting situations will be unstable because of strategic manipulation by single individuals. The concept of stability used is weaker than the stability concepts figuring in many earlier contributions in this area, insofar as under the concept used here any individual, while disrupting a given voting situation, considers the possibility of retaliation by other individuals.

Log In To View Full Content