This paper develops a sufficient statistics framework for analyzing the welfare effects of disability insurance (DI). We derive social‐optimality conditions for the two main DI policy parameters: (i) eligibility rules and (ii) benefit levels. Applying this framework to two restrictive DI reforms in Austria, we find that tighter DI eligibility rules triggered higher fiscal cost savings and lower insurance losses. Hence, tighter DI eligibility rules dominate DI benefit reductions in scaling back the Austrian DI system.
MLA
Haller, Andreas, et al. “Designing Disability Insurance Reforms: Tightening Eligibility Rules or Reducing Benefits?.” Econometrica, vol. 92, .no 1, Econometric Society, 2024, pp. 79-110, https://doi.org/10.3982/ECTA19021
Chicago
Haller, Andreas, Stefan Staubli, and Josef Zweimüller. “Designing Disability Insurance Reforms: Tightening Eligibility Rules or Reducing Benefits?.” Econometrica, 92, .no 1, (Econometric Society: 2024), 79-110. https://doi.org/10.3982/ECTA19021
APA
Haller, A., Staubli, S., & Zweimüller, J. (2024). Designing Disability Insurance Reforms: Tightening Eligibility Rules or Reducing Benefits?. Econometrica, 92(1), 79-110. https://doi.org/10.3982/ECTA19021
The Executive Committee of the Econometric Society has approved an increase in the submission fees for papers in Econometrica. Starting January 1, 2025, the fee for new submissions to Econometrica will be US$125 for regular members and US$50 for student members.
By clicking the "Accept" button or continuing to browse our site, you agree to first-party and session-only cookies being stored on your device. Cookies are used to optimize your experience and anonymously analyze website performance and traffic.