Econometrica: May 2022, Volume 90, Issue 3

Randomize at your own Risk: on the Observability of Ambiguity Aversion

https://doi.org/10.3982/ECTA18137
p. 1085-1107

Aurélien Baillon, Yoram Halevy, Chen Li

Facing several decisions, people may consider each one in isolation or integrate them into a single optimization problem. Isolation and integration may yield different choices, for instance, if uncertainty is involved, and only one randomly selected decision is implemented. We investigate whether the random incentive system in experiments that measure ambiguity aversion provides a hedge against ambiguity, making ambiguity‐averse subjects who integrate behave as if they were ambiguity neutral. Our results suggest that about half of the ambiguity averse subjects integrated their choices in the experiment into a single problem, whereas the other half isolated. Our design further enables us to disentangle properties of the integrating subjects' preferences over compound objects induced by the random incentive system and the choice problems in the experiment.



Log In To View Full Content

Supplemental Material

Supplement to "Randomize at your own Risk: on the Observability of Ambiguity Aversion"

This zip file contains replication files for the manuscript.

Read More View ZIP


Supplement to "Randomize at your own Risk: on the Observability of Ambiguity Aversion"

This online appendix contains material not found within the manuscript.

Read More View PDF


Supplement to "Randomize at your own Risk: on the Observability of Ambiguity Aversion"

Experimental Material for the manuscript.

Read More View PDF



Back