Econometrica: Nov 2020, Volume 88, Issue 6

On the Informativeness of Descriptive Statistics for Structural Estimates

https://doi.org/10.3982/ECTA16768
p. 2231-2258

Isaiah Andrews, Matthew Gentzkow, Jesse M. Shapiro

We propose a way to formalize the relationship between descriptive analysis and structural estimation. A researcher reports an estimate ĉ of a structural quantity of interest c that is exactly or asymptotically unbiased under some base model. The researcher also reports descriptive statistics that estimate features γ of the distribution of the data that are related to c under the base model. A reader entertains a less restrictive model that is local to the base model, under which the estimate ĉ may be biased. We study the reduction in worst‐case bias from a restriction that requires the reader's model to respect the relationship between c and γ specified by the base model. Our main result shows that the proportional reduction in worst‐case bias depends only on a quantity we call the informativeness of for ĉ. Informativeness can be easily estimated even for complex models. We recommend that researchers report estimated informativeness alongside their descriptive analyses, and we illustrate with applications to three recent papers.



Log In To View Full Content

Supplemental Material

Supplement to "On the Informativeness of Descriptive Statistics for Structural Estimates"

This zip file contains the replication files for the manuscript.

Read More View ZIP


Supplement to "On the Informativeness of Descriptive Statistics for Structural Estimates"

This online appendix contains material not found within the manuscript.

Read More View PDF


Back