Econometrica: Jul 2017, Volume 85, Issue 4

Partial Ambiguity

https://doi.org/10.3982/ECTA13239
p. 1239-1260

Soo Hong Chew, Bin Miao, Songfa Zhong

We extend Ellsberg's two‐urn paradox and propose three symmetric forms of partial ambiguity by limiting the possible compositions in a deck of 100 red and black cards in three ways. Interval ambiguity involves a symmetric range of 50- n to 50+n red cards. Complementarily, disjoint ambiguity arises from two nonintersecting intervals of 0 to n and 100 − n to 100 red cards. Two‐point ambiguity involves n or 100 −n red cards. We investigate experimentally attitudes towards partial ambiguity and the corresponding compound lotteries in which the possible compositions are drawn with equal objective probabilities. This yields three key findings: distinct attitudes towards the three forms of partial ambiguity, significant association across attitudes towards partial ambiguity and compound risk, and source preference between two‐point ambiguity and two‐point compound risk. Our findings help discriminate among models of ambiguity in the literature.



Log In To View Full Content

Supplemental Material

Supplement to "Partial Ambiguity"

This zip file contains replication files for the manuscript.

Read More View ZIP


Supplement to "Partial Ambiguity"

This online appendix contains material not found within the manuscript.

Read More View PDF


Back