The Econometric Society An International Society for the Advancement of Economic Theory in its Relation to Statistics and Mathematics
Home Contacts
Econometrica

New Journals

Econometrica
Editorial Board
Journal News

Monograph Series

July 1994 - Volume 62 Issue 4 Page 853 - 880


p.853


Infinite Horizon Incomplete Markets

Michael Magill
Martine Quinzii

Abstract

The model of general equilibrium with incomplete markets is a generalization of the Arrow-Debreu model which provides a rich framework for studying problems of macroeconomics. This paper shows how the model, which has so far been restricted to economies with a finite horizon, can be extended to the more natural setting of an open-ended future, thereby providing an extension of the finite horizon representative agent models of modern macroeconomics to economies with heterogeneous agents and incomplete markets. There are two natural concepts of equilibrium over an infinite horizon which prevent agents from entering into Ponzi schemes, that is, from indefinitely postponing the repayment of their debts. The first is based on debt constraints which place bounds on debt at each date-event; the second is based on transversality conditions which limit the asymptotic rate of growth of debt. The concept of an equilibrium with debt constraint is a natural concept of equilibrium for macroeconomic analysis; however the concept of an equilibrium with transversality condition is more amenable to theoretical analysis since it permits the powerful techniques of Arrow-Debreu theory to be carried over to the setting of incomplete markets. In an economy in which agents are impatient (expressed by the Mackey continuity of their preference orderings) and have a degree of impatience at each date-event which is bounded below (a concept defined in the paper), we show that the equilibria of an economy with transversality condition coincide with the equilibria with debt constraints. An equilibrium with transversality condition is shown to exist: it follows that for each economy there is an explicit bound $M$ such that an equilibrium with explicit debt constraint $M$ exists, in which the constraint is never binding--this latter property ensuring that the debt constraint, whose objective is to prevent Ponzi schemes, does not in itself introduce a new imperfection into the model over and above the incompleteness of the markets.

Full content Login                                    

Note: to view the fulltext of the article, please login first and then click the "full content" button. If you are based at a subscribing Institution or Library or if you have a separate access to JSTOR/Wiley Online Library please click on the "Institutional access" button.
Prev | All Articles | Next
Go to top
Membership



Email me my password
Join/Renew
Change your address
Register for password
Require login:
Amend your profile
E-mail Alerting
The Society
About the Society
Society News
Society Reports
Officers
Fellows
Members
Regions
Meetings
Future Meetings
Past Meetings
Meeting Announcements
Google
web this site
   
Wiley-Blackwell
Site created and maintained by Wiley-Blackwell.
Comments? Contact customsiteshelp@wiley.com
To view our Privacy Policy, please click here.