The Econometric Society An International Society for the Advancement of Economic Theory in its Relation to Statistics and Mathematics
Home Contacts
Econometrica

New Journals

Econometrica
Editorial Board
Journal News

Monograph Series

September 1988 - Volume 56 Issue 5 Page 997 - 1019


p.997


Approximate Power Functions for Some Robust Tests of Regression Coefficients

Thomas J. Rothenberg

Abstract

Asymptotically valid procedures are available for testing hypotheses on the slope coefficients in a linear regression model where the error covariance matrix @s depends on an unknown parameter vector @Q. Two situations can be distinguished. In one case, @Q has low dimension and can be well estimated from the data; tests on the slope coefficients are based on generalized least squares using the estimated @Q. In the second case, the parameter vector @Q has high dimension and cannot be well estimated; tests are based on the ordinary least squares slope coefficients using a robust estimate of their covariance matrix. When the null hypothesis consists of a single constraint, the test statistics in both cases are ratios of estimated slope coefficients to their estimated standard errors and are asymptotically normal as the sample size n tends to infinity. In the present paper, Edgeworth approximations with error @?(n^-^1) are developed for the distribution functions of these test statistics under the assumption that the errors are normal. In both cases, adjustments to the asymptotic critical values are found to insure that the tests have correct size to a second order of approximation. Approximate local power functions are derived for the size-adjusted tests and the power loss due to the estimation of @s is calculated. The second-order adjustments to the asymptotic distributions are relatively simple, but depend on the particular functional form for @s(@Q). Two examples, one involving heteroscedasticity and the other autocorrelation, are worked out in detail. These examples suggest that the size and power correction terms can be large even in very simple models where asymptotic theory might be expected to work well. It appears that the null rejection probabilities of the commonly proposed robust regression tests are often considerably greater than their nominal level. Moreover, the cost of not k@s can sometimes be substantial.

Full content Login                                    

Note: to view the fulltext of the article, please login first and then click the "full content" button. If you are based at a subscribing Institution or Library or if you have a separate access to JSTOR/Wiley Online Library please click on the "Institutional access" button.
Prev | All Articles | Next
Go to top
Membership



Email me my password
Join/Renew
Change your address
Register for password
Require login:
Amend your profile
E-mail Alerting
The Society
About the Society
Society News
Society Reports
Officers
Fellows
Members
Regions
Meetings
Future Meetings
Past Meetings
Meeting Announcements
Google
web this site
   
Wiley-Blackwell
Site created and maintained by Wiley-Blackwell.
Comments? Contact customsiteshelp@wiley.com
To view our Privacy Policy, please click here.